7 files

Annual dendrometer data from the Barro Colorado Island 50-ha forest dynamics plot for 2015-2020

posted on 22.06.2022, 15:48 authored by Pablo Ramos, Paulino Villareal, Richard ConditRichard Condit, Katherine CushmanKatherine Cushman, Helene Muller-LandauHelene Muller-Landau

Please cite these data as

Ramos, Pablo, Paulino Villareal, Richard Condit, KC Cushman, and Helene C. Muller-Landau. 2022. Annual dendrometer data from the Barro Colorado Island 50-ha forest dynamics plot for 2015-2020. Smithsonian Figshare. DOI 10.25573/data.19985066

Corresponding author: Helene C. Muller-Landau, mullerh@si.edu

These are data from recensuses of dendrometer bands on selected trees on the Barro Colorado Island 50 ha forest dynamics plot, part of the Smithsonian ForestGEO network of large forest dynamics plots. 

They appear in the form in which they were used by Jessica F. Needham in analyses for the following publication: 

Needham, J.F., Arellano, G., Davies, S.J., Fisher, R.A., Hammer, V., Knox, R., Mitre, D., Muller-Landau, H.C., Zuleta, D., and Koven, C.D. Tree crown damage and its effects on forest carbon cycling in a tropical forest. 2022. Global Change Biology. 

The data archived here are for six dendrometer censuses that took place in the late wet seasons of 2015 (census 16), 2016 (census 18), 2017 (census 20), 2018 (census 22), 2019 (census 23), and 2020 (census 24). 


Research design and supervision: Helene C. Muller-Landau
Data collection: Pablo Ramos, Paulino Villareal

Database design and curation procedure: Richard Condit, Helene C. Muller-Landau, Anudeep Singh

Calculation of diameter with correction for curvature: Matteo Detto, Helene C. Muller-Landau

Data QAQC (quality assurance and quality control): Helene C. Muller-Landau, Pablo Ramos, Richard Condit, KC Cushman, Adam Collins, Pete Kerby-Miller, Suzanne Lao. 

Funding: The BCI 50 ha plot dendrometer data collection was initiated with funding from the HSBC Climate Partnership (2007-2011) and was continued with funding from the Smithsonian Institution ForestGEO program. 

This study was located within and enabled by the Barro Colorado 50-ha plot. 

The data for the main censuses of this plot through 2015 are available in the following data publication: 

Condit R., Perez, R., Aguilar, S., Lao, S., Foster, R., Hubbell, S.P. 2019. Complete data from the Barro Colorado 50-ha plot: 423617 trees, 35 years, 2019 version. https://doi.org/10.15146/5xcp-0d46.

Trees were selected in a size-stratified and spatially stratified design, as detailed below. 

100 40x40 m subplots were placed randomly across the plot, with the constraint that these plots were nonoverlapping and that their edges aligned with the edges of 20x20 m quadrats. The centers of these plots, in 50 ha plot coordinates (units of meters), are given in the file “bci40x40sxy.txt”, included as part of this repository.  All trees with a dbh (diameter at 1.3 m or above buttresses) of 80 cm or larger were included throughout the plot. Trees with a dbh of 40-80 cm were included if they were located within the 40x40 m subplots. Trees with a dbh of 20-40 cm were included if they were located within 20x20 m subplots centered within the 40x40 m subplots. Trees with a dbh of 10-20 cm were included if they were located within 10x10 m subplots centered within the 40x40 m subplots. Trees with a dbh of 5-10 cm were included if they were located within 5x5 m subplots centered within the 40x40 m subplots. (Here, dbh of 5-10 cm means dbh greater than or equal to 5 cm, and less than 10 cm, and so forth.) 

The initial sample was selected in 2007 (based on the 2005 census data), and new recruits into the spatially and size-stratified sample were added after each main plot census (main plot censuses in 2010, 2015). In adding trees to the initial census based on the 2005 census data, the size threshold for checking trees was lower than the size threshold for inclusion, to try to insure that trees that had grown into the size class since the 2005 census were included. Some selected trees were not appropriate for installation of dendrometers for one or more of the following reasons: palms (excluded because they do not generally grow in diameter), strangler figs (form too irregular for band dendrometers to provide useful information about woody growth), very large buttresses which would require a band being placed above 7.6 m (not possible to safely place and remeasure bands at this height with the available ladder and personnel), or large lianas or strangler figs affixed so closely to the trunk that a band could not be placed underneath them and that a band above them would not provide useful information on tree growth. In the case of multi-stemmed individuals, bands were placed on all stems above 5 cm if the biggest stem qualified for inclusion, and smaller stems were measured with calipers. 

Dendrometer censuses were initially conducted twice per year, at the beginning of the wet season (May-June) and end of the wet season (November-December). However, the early wet season censuses often showed shrinkage of trees from the previous late wet season measurements. Biweekly remeasurements of another smaller sample of trees on the nearby AVA plot showed that dry season shrinkage was common in many trees, and that many did not recover to their previous dbh until well into the wet season. Thus for the purposes of annual growth measurements, it was decided to abandon the early wet season measurements starting in 2019. 

Tree measurements and observations followed the protocol at  https://figshare.com/s/00d6ba1e9f113bcf3ac3

The calculation of dbh from the band dendrometer data follows the procedure described at 



HSBC Climate Partnership

Smithsonian ForestGEO